View Full Version : FEAR 2 V. Ridiculous
IDSkot
03-20-2009, 05:39 PM
I downloaded FEAR 2: Project Origin.
It's approximately 11.2gb. I downloaded it, installed it. I started playing at 3 AM last night, stopped at 4. I woke up at 12, played until 3:30, then I left for an hour, came back at 4:30, played it until 6:30...
And I just beat it. =|
The graphics and short story does not equate to 11.2 gigs... I must be missing something.
PS
HEADSHOT:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v714/TwistedShot/headshot.jpg
shaneb
03-21-2009, 12:23 PM
Eh, I couldn't get into the first one. Not sure what it was about the game, however, the first time I played it, it scared the crap out of me.
11.2 Gigs?
Interesting....
What was the total time in finishing the game?
IDSkot
03-21-2009, 12:29 PM
Eh, I couldn't get into the first one. Not sure what it was about the game, however, the first time I played it, it scared the crap out of me.
11.2 Gigs?
Interesting....
What was the total time in finishing the game?
I played from about 2:30 AM to 4 AM, slept 'till 12, played until 3:30, went out to do some errands, came back at 4:30, beat it at 6:30.
6 hours.
mackin
03-21-2009, 03:31 PM
multiplayer?
John3000
03-21-2009, 09:32 PM
Ending = Retarded :fyi:
IDSkot
03-21-2009, 09:39 PM
multiplayer?
I don't play games online anymore... but even still, worth the 7+ gb of data? Not.
Ending = Retarded :fyi:
Whole thing == Retarded :fyi:
Alcoholic
03-26-2009, 10:52 PM
I played the first one, was some creepy shit in it. Although there was something wrong with the sound so I never bothered to beat it or reinstall it after I rebuilt my comp. meh.
w00tah
04-28-2009, 03:25 AM
This one as taxing on the graphics as the first one was when it first came out?
IDSkot
04-28-2009, 06:22 AM
This one as taxing on the graphics as the first one was when it first came out?
I honestly couldn't tell you. I have a 9800GTX, so all of the new games that come out I can play on full graphics no problem. :\
ngsm13
04-28-2009, 10:29 AM
I honestly couldn't tell you. I have a 9800GTX, so all of the new games that come out I can play on full graphics no problem. :\
Not Crisis.
nG
w00tah
05-07-2009, 07:38 PM
Not Crisis.
nG
Truf, Crysis kills graphics like a Funky Pup does windows, like so.
IDSkot
05-07-2009, 08:07 PM
Not Crisis.
nG
LOLZ
I used to play Crysis with full graphics with 60 FPS.
w00tah
05-07-2009, 08:20 PM
LOLZ
I used to play Crysis with full graphics with 60 FPS.
DX9 or 10? What proc, board and RAM?
IDSkot
05-07-2009, 08:31 PM
DX9 or 10? What proc, board and RAM?
DX9, niggs.
E8200 @ 2.6/core (C2D), I forget what board, but I have 2GB of CORSAIR DDR2 and a 9800GTX overclocked core @ 736mHZ
w00tah
05-07-2009, 08:37 PM
DX9, niggs.
E8200 @ 2.6/core (C2D), I forget what board, but I have 2GB of CORSAIR DDR2 and a 9800GTX overclocked core @ 736mHZ
You wouldn't have had much of shit on 10. Otherwise, nice setup you gots there :)
IDSkot
05-07-2009, 08:41 PM
You wouldn't have had much of shit on 10. Otherwise, nice setup you gots there :)
I'd neg you for this comment if I could.
Pop Da Hatch
05-07-2009, 08:54 PM
faggots.
w00tah
05-07-2009, 08:58 PM
I'd neg you for this comment if I could.
Oh really? Crysis on DX10 sucks on pretty much ANY single card, OC'd or not. At least it did.
IDSkot
05-07-2009, 09:54 PM
Oh really? Crysis on DX10 sucks on pretty much ANY single card, OC'd or not. At least it did.
No, I'd neg you for even presenting such a preposterous idea.
A GAMING RIG OF VISTA?! CALL DEMAN! HE'LL HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY! (pro, of course.)
fiercetimbo17
05-08-2009, 04:43 PM
I run vista on a "gaming" rig, I do because i have 8 gigs of ram and two gtx280s in SLI, i cant even fully run crysis
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.